H Christopher Moss CPA Tax Attorney
FOLLOW US
  • Home
  • About
  • Chris Moss CPA Attorney Tax Blog
  • Contact

TAX ADVICE AND ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

4/26/2025

 
Is Tax Advice Legal Advice subject to Attorney Client Privilege

By H Christopher Moss CPA Tax Attorney

Welcome to TaxView with H Christopher Moss CPA Tax Attorney

Are your tax communications with your tax attorney privileged under the attorney client confidentiality privilege? Are you receiving privileged communications from your tax attorney when there is tax advice being given?  The United States Circuit Courts are split on the issue of attorney client privilege of tax advice and it was thought perhaps the US Supreme Court would settle the answer to the age old question is Tax advice Legal Advice when they agreed to hear oral arguments in Re Grand Jury  The question presented to the US Supreme Court in 2023 almost would have answered this question--- almost---- in that after the Supreme Court heard oral argument In Re Grand Jury, the Court changed its mind  with a DIG (dismissed as improvidently granted) and decided not to hear the case.  Why did the Supreme Court hear oral arguments and then issue the DIG?  Stay with us here on TaxView and find out the exciting answers to the age old questions is tax advice legal advice and is that legal advice subject to the attorney client privilege?

Attorney client privilege has been around hundreds of years.  History shows that under Roman law and English law there were competing rationales of chivalry vs justice and truth.  Embedded in all states bar association ethics is the attorney client privilege and is beyond argument that Courts in every state have enforced the fundamental backbone of the legal profession that communications between and attorney and their client are confidential.  However, what if the communication involves tax advice?

What is tax advice?   The US Code 26 U.S. Code Section 7525 states that with respect to tax advice, the same common law protections of confidentiality which apply to a communication between a taxpayer and an attorney shall also apply to a communication between a taxpayer and any federally authorized tax practitioner to the extent the communication would be considered a privileged communication if it were between a taxpayer and an attorney.  But when is tax advice “legal tax advice”?  When is the advice legal advice?

It would seem very easy to say legal advice is advice given by an attorney to his client and the resulting communications from the client to his attorney as was decided in the 7th Circuit in USA vs Richard Frederick et al argued in 1999. Also see (Brief for the United States in Opposition.  The facts are simple.  The Government says the tax return preparation is not subject to the attorney client privilege.  But Judge Posner, Chief Judge says the tax preparer here was also the taxpayers' lawyer, and it cannot be assumed that everything transmitted to him by the taxpayer was intended to assist him in his tax-preparation function and thus might be conveyed to the IRS, rather than in his legal-representation function. Cf. United States v. (Under Seal), 748 F.2d 871, 875-76 (4th Cir. 1984). 
 
However, in the 9th Circuit in RE GRAND JURY the question was not so easy.  On appeal from the US District Court in California Judge Lee starts the Opinion “Given our increasingly complex regulatory landscape, attorneys often wear dual hats, serving as both a lawyer and a trusted business advisor. Our court, however, has yet to articulate a consistent standard for determining when the attorney-client privilege applies to dual-purpose communications that implicate both legal and business concerns.”  The District Court ruled that “dual-purpose” communications were at play here and those documents were not privileged because the primary purpose of the documents was to obtain tax advice not legal advice.  The law firm (which is not identified) argued the documents were not subject to the “primary purpose” test but rather the “because of” test.  Judge Lee concludes that the primary purpose test governs in assessing attorney-client privilege for dual-purpose communications.

Judge Lee continues his Opinion as follows “some communications might have more than one purpose, especially “in the tax law context, where an attorney’s advice may integrally involve both legal and nonlegal analyses.” Sanmina, 968 F.3d at 1118. Sanmina, for example, involved communications about the propriety of a particular tax deduction, which could have both a non-legal purpose (tax compliance considerations) as well as potentially a legal purpose (seeking advice on what to do if the IRS challenged the deduction). Id. at 1117–18.  When dual-purpose communications are involved, there are two potential tests that courts have adopted’  The primary purpose” test and the “because of” test. Under the “primary purpose” test, courts look at whether the primary purpose of the communication is to give or receive legal advice, as opposed to business or tax advice. See In re County of Erie, 473 F.3d 413, 420 (2d Cir. 2007) (“We consider whether the predominant purpose of the communication is to render or solicit legal advice.”). The natural implication of this inquiry is that a dual-purpose communication can only have a single “primary” purpose. On the other hand, the “because of” test—which typically applies in the work-product context—“does not consider whether litigation was a primary or secondary motive behind the creation of a document.” In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/Torf Env’t Mgmt.), 357 F.3d 900, 908 (9th Cir. 2004). It instead “considers the totality of the circumstances and affords protection when it can fairly be said that the document was created because of anticipated litigation and would not have been created in substantially similar form but for the prospect of that litigation.” Id. (cleaned up). It is a broader test than the “primary purpose” test because it looks only at causal connection, and not a “primary” reason. See Visa U.S.A., Inc. v. First Data Corp., No. C-02-1786JSW(EMC), 2004 WL 1878209, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2004). In the attorney-client privilege context, the “because of” test might thus ask whether a dual-purpose communication was made “because of” the need to give or receive legal advice.

As the Sanmina court recently noted, the Ninth Circuit has not explicitly adopted either the “primary purpose” test or the “because of” test in determining whether dual-purpose communications are entitled to attorney-client privilege. Sanmina, 968 F.3d at 1107  Sanmina itself declined to resolve this issue because the district court there had made a factual finding that the communications were not dual purpose. Id. at 1119. Without guidance from our court, district courts in this circuit have split, applying both tests for attorney-client privilege claims. Id. at 1118 n.5 (summarizing district court cases).
Judge Lee concludes because this case squarely involves dual-purpose communications, we now answer the question that Sanmina left open. We hold that the primary-purpose test applies to attorney-client privilege claims for dual-purpose communications.
​
There is a clear and obvious difference between the test the D.C. Circuit actually applies and the test that the Ninth Circuit announced and applied in this case. The D.C. Circuit asks whether obtaining or providing legal advice is "one of the significant purposes" of the communication. In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 760 (D.C. Cir. 2014). That test recognizes that attorney-client communications may have multiple purposes and is designed to avoid intractable inquiries into the relative importance of the legal and non-legal aspects of a communication. Id. at 759-760.

Surprisingly the US Supreme Court decided to hear the case on Writ of Certiorari. The Petitioner Brief supporting Writ of Certiorari perhaps because The Ninth Circuit's decision created a three-way split as to when dual-purpose communications are privileged. The government's opposition rests principally on the Ninth Circuit's assertion that there was no conflict with the D.C. Circuit. But the Ninth Circuit was able to make that assertion only by misconstruing the D.C. Circuit's approach.

The US opposition in their Brief asked the Supreme Court to decide:   Whether the district court permissibly denied petitioner’s general claim of attorney-client privilege over communications, related to the preparation of a tax return, that did not have obtaining legal advice as their primary purpose, while instructing that all legal advice contained in the communications be redacted. The Ninth Circuit, by contrast, holds that a communication "can only have a single 'primary' purpose," Pet.  App.  4a, and requires  courts  to  determine whether a communication's legal purpose is at least as significant as its non-legal purpose, Pet. App. 12a. It thus requires precisely the kinds of intractable inquiries that the D.C. Circuit's test is designed to avoid. District courts in the Ninth Circuit were previously split on the primary purpose doctrine.

In a legal update article by Stephanie Adler and Stephanie Satterfield The Court granted certiorari in October 2022 to clarify the scope of attorney-client privilege in the context of dual-purpose communications.  Adler and Satterfield say the Circuit courts are split on the issue, with the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fifth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits defining the scope of privilege by the primary purpose of the communication (primary purpose test). The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit defines the scope of privilege by determining whether one of the significant purposes of the communication was to obtain or provide legal advice (significant purpose test).

Finally the case arrived at the Supreme Court and Oral Argument was set for January 9, 2023 and various Brief Amicus curiae were filed by various organizations in 9th Circuit in RE GRAND JURY.  After oral arguments the US Supreme Court on January 23 2023 in a shocking development created a DIG and dismissed the case. 

Adler and Satterfield summarize as follows:  “perhaps foreshadowing the disposition of the case, Justice Elena Kagan asked counsel for the petitioner-law firm at oral argument to comment on “the ancient legal principle ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.’” Justice Sonia Sotomayor was similarly skeptical of the need to weigh in on the split, noting that courts are not struggling to apply the primary purpose test. On the other hand, the justices appeared to struggle to obtain clarity on the limits and contours of the significant purpose test.” 

In conclusion, there are various splits in US Circuits on what exactly is privileged for a tax attorney and his clients. Dual purpose communications between attorney and his tax client are looked at very closely particularly now in the 9th Circuit.   Ask your attorney what is the “primary purpose test” vs the “because of test”.  The “because of test” according to the NY Law Journal “looks at the totality of circumstances to assess whether it was made “because of” the need to provide or receive legal advice.  Jeremy Temkin concludes “given the absence of clarity from the Supreme Court, disputes will continue to arise over the application of the attorney-client privilege to dual-purpose communications. Tax practitioners need to be especially conscious of this issue. While attorneys can and do give legal advice in connection with the preparation of tax returns, the legal and nonlegal purposes of such advice are frequently entangled, thereby creating a risk that a court applying the primary purpose test will reject a claim of privilege since it is hard to conclude that the legal aspect of the attorney’s advice predominates. See Brief for American College of Tax Counsel as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner at 7-8, In re Grand Jury, No. 21-1397 (Nov. 23, 2022)

Ask your CPA Tax Attorney whether they understand the “primary purpose test” from the 9th Circuit vs the “because of test” from the DC Circuit.  Keep on the look out for updates on TaxView by H Christopher Moss CPA Attorney soon.

Thank you for joining H Christopher Moss CPA Attorney on TaxView


    Chris Moss CPA 
    Tax Attorney
    ATTORNEY AT LAW (DC VA)
    Advocate of entrepreneurs and small business

    Archives

    April 2025
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014

    Categories

    All
    1031
    1031 Exchange
    1031 Investment
    1031 Related Party
    1031 Sale Leaseback
    1031 Sale Or Investment?
    10% Tithe Tax
    16th Amendment
    21st Century Tax
    501(c)(3) Tax Exempt
    Accounting Records
    Alimony
    Alimony Audit
    Alternative Minimum Tax
    Amt
    Appeals Divsiion
    Asset Protection
    Asset Protection Trust
    Attorney Fees
    Audited Government Financial Statements
    Bad Debt
    Bad Debt Audit
    Bad Debt Expense
    Basis Shifting 1031
    Boating Tax Deductions
    Business Air Travel
    Business Purpose Doctrine
    Business Valuation
    Cdp Hearing
    Charitable Donations
    Charitable Remainder Trust
    Charity
    Charity Deductions
    Charity Foundation
    Charity Foundation
    Clergy Housing
    Clunker Tax
    Completed Contract Method
    Conservation Easements
    Conservation Program
    Cost Basis
    Cost Segregation
    Criminal Division
    Criminal Investigation
    Crummey
    Crummey Trust
    Crut
    Damage Awards
    DAPT
    Death Gift Estate Tax
    Debt Forgiveness
    Depreciation
    Disguised Sale
    Disregarded Entity
    Domestic Asset Protection Trust
    Doomsday Levy
    Drug Trafficking
    Due Process Hearing
    ESTATE PLAN
    Estate Plan Gifting
    Estate Planning Gifting
    Estate Tax
    Estate Tax Planning
    Family Limited Liability Company
    Family Llc
    Family LLC Discount
    Farming
    Fin 48
    Financial Records
    Foreign Income
    Foreign Income Exclusion
    Gambling Losses
    Gaming
    Gifting
    Gift Tax
    Gig Irs Audit
    Gig Worker
    Hobby Loss
    Hobby Loss Rule
    Howard Hughes
    Identity Theft
    Income Tax
    Income Tax Obsolete
    Innocent Spouse
    Innocent Spouse Audit
    IRS 2036(a)
    Irs Alimony Audit
    Irs Appeals
    Irs Appeals Division
    Irs Appellate Procedure
    IRS AUDIT
    Irs Bad Debt Audit
    Irs Cap Gain To Ordinary Income Audit
    Irs Capital Gain
    Irs Charity Audit
    Irs Collection
    Irs Crummey Audit
    Irs Crut Audit
    Irs Gig Worker
    Irs Innocent Spouse
    Irs Lease To Buy Audit
    Irs Legal Fees
    Irs Legal Fees Audit
    Irs Marijuana Audit
    Irs Marijuana Tax
    Irs Offset Audit
    Irs Offset Tax Audit
    Irs Ordinary Income
    Irs Preacher Of The Gospel
    Irs Whipsaw Audit
    Irs Whistleblower
    Lease To Buy Audit
    Levy
    Llc Discounts
    Llc Single Member
    Loan-Out
    Marijuana Income Tax
    Marijuana Stores
    Marijuana Tax
    Marijuana Taxation
    Marijuana Tax Audit
    Mark To Market
    Medical Marijuana
    Member Discounts
    Minimum Tax
    Mortgage Interest
    Mortgage Interest Audit
    National Sales Tax
    Nonbusiness Bad Debt
    Nst
    Offer Compromise
    Offset Tax Audit
    Offshore Evasion
    Offshore Tax Evasion
    Offshore Tax Fraud
    Offshore Tax Shelters
    Parsonage Allowance
    Parsonage Exclusion
    Passive Loss
    Permanent Deductions
    Portfolio Income
    Private Foundation
    Private Foundation
    Real Estate Development
    Related Parties
    Related Party 1031 Exchange
    Residence To Rental Conversion
    Retirement Rollover
    Reverse 1031
    Reverse Exchange
    Rollover Traps
    Sale Leaseback
    Sale Or Investment?
    Sale Vs Distribution
    Section 1031 Us Virgin Islands
    Section 1031 Virgin Islands
    Section 163
    Section 167
    SECTION 2036
    Self Employment Tax
    Short Sales
    Single Member Llc
    SLAT
    Spousal Lifetime Access Trust
    Statute Of Limitations
    Step Transaction
    Structural Components
    Substance Over Form
    Substitute Return
    Substitute Tax Return
    Tax Deferral
    Tax Exempt
    Tax Exempt
    Tax Free Income Virgin Islands
    Tax Free Rollover
    Tax Positions
    Tax Reform
    Tax Reform 1986
    Temporary Deductions
    Temporary Tax Deductions
    Testamentary Transfers
    Theft Loss
    Timing Differences
    Trader In Securities
    Trader Or Investor?
    Travel
    Uncertain Tax Positions
    Unitrust Crut
    Unremibursed Expense
    Us Virgin Islands
    Value Added Tax
    Value Diminution Trap
    Vat
    Virgin Islands Tax Free
    Virgin Islands Tax Free Exchange
    Volunteer Expense
    W2
    Wealth Preservation
    Whipsaw
    Whistleblower
    Yacht Tax Deductions

    Categories

    All
    1031
    1031 Exchange
    1031 Investment
    1031 Related Party
    1031 Sale Leaseback
    1031 Sale Or Investment?
    10% Tithe Tax
    16th Amendment
    21st Century Tax
    501(c)(3) Tax Exempt
    Accounting Records
    Alimony
    Alimony Audit
    Alternative Minimum Tax
    Amt
    Appeals Divsiion
    Asset Protection
    Asset Protection Trust
    Attorney Fees
    Audited Government Financial Statements
    Bad Debt
    Bad Debt Audit
    Bad Debt Expense
    Basis Shifting 1031
    Boating Tax Deductions
    Business Air Travel
    Business Purpose Doctrine
    Business Valuation
    Cdp Hearing
    Charitable Donations
    Charitable Remainder Trust
    Charity
    Charity Deductions
    Charity Foundation
    Charity Foundation
    Clergy Housing
    Clunker Tax
    Completed Contract Method
    Conservation Easements
    Conservation Program
    Cost Basis
    Cost Segregation
    Criminal Division
    Criminal Investigation
    Crummey
    Crummey Trust
    Crut
    Damage Awards
    DAPT
    Death Gift Estate Tax
    Debt Forgiveness
    Depreciation
    Disguised Sale
    Disregarded Entity
    Domestic Asset Protection Trust
    Doomsday Levy
    Drug Trafficking
    Due Process Hearing
    ESTATE PLAN
    Estate Plan Gifting
    Estate Planning Gifting
    Estate Tax
    Estate Tax Planning
    Family Limited Liability Company
    Family Llc
    Family LLC Discount
    Farming
    Fin 48
    Financial Records
    Foreign Income
    Foreign Income Exclusion
    Gambling Losses
    Gaming
    Gifting
    Gift Tax
    Gig Irs Audit
    Gig Worker
    Hobby Loss
    Hobby Loss Rule
    Howard Hughes
    Identity Theft
    Income Tax
    Income Tax Obsolete
    Innocent Spouse
    Innocent Spouse Audit
    IRS 2036(a)
    Irs Alimony Audit
    Irs Appeals
    Irs Appeals Division
    Irs Appellate Procedure
    IRS AUDIT
    Irs Bad Debt Audit
    Irs Cap Gain To Ordinary Income Audit
    Irs Capital Gain
    Irs Charity Audit
    Irs Collection
    Irs Crummey Audit
    Irs Crut Audit
    Irs Gig Worker
    Irs Innocent Spouse
    Irs Lease To Buy Audit
    Irs Legal Fees
    Irs Legal Fees Audit
    Irs Marijuana Audit
    Irs Marijuana Tax
    Irs Offset Audit
    Irs Offset Tax Audit
    Irs Ordinary Income
    Irs Preacher Of The Gospel
    Irs Whipsaw Audit
    Irs Whistleblower
    Lease To Buy Audit
    Levy
    Llc Discounts
    Llc Single Member
    Loan-Out
    Marijuana Income Tax
    Marijuana Stores
    Marijuana Tax
    Marijuana Taxation
    Marijuana Tax Audit
    Mark To Market
    Medical Marijuana
    Member Discounts
    Minimum Tax
    Mortgage Interest
    Mortgage Interest Audit
    National Sales Tax
    Nonbusiness Bad Debt
    Nst
    Offer Compromise
    Offset Tax Audit
    Offshore Evasion
    Offshore Tax Evasion
    Offshore Tax Fraud
    Offshore Tax Shelters
    Parsonage Allowance
    Parsonage Exclusion
    Passive Loss
    Permanent Deductions
    Portfolio Income
    Private Foundation
    Private Foundation
    Real Estate Development
    Related Parties
    Related Party 1031 Exchange
    Residence To Rental Conversion
    Retirement Rollover
    Reverse 1031
    Reverse Exchange
    Rollover Traps
    Sale Leaseback
    Sale Or Investment?
    Sale Vs Distribution
    Section 1031 Us Virgin Islands
    Section 1031 Virgin Islands
    Section 163
    Section 167
    SECTION 2036
    Self Employment Tax
    Short Sales
    Single Member Llc
    SLAT
    Spousal Lifetime Access Trust
    Statute Of Limitations
    Step Transaction
    Structural Components
    Substance Over Form
    Substitute Return
    Substitute Tax Return
    Tax Deferral
    Tax Exempt
    Tax Exempt
    Tax Free Income Virgin Islands
    Tax Free Rollover
    Tax Positions
    Tax Reform
    Tax Reform 1986
    Temporary Deductions
    Temporary Tax Deductions
    Testamentary Transfers
    Theft Loss
    Timing Differences
    Trader In Securities
    Trader Or Investor?
    Travel
    Uncertain Tax Positions
    Unitrust Crut
    Unremibursed Expense
    Us Virgin Islands
    Value Added Tax
    Value Diminution Trap
    Vat
    Virgin Islands Tax Free
    Virgin Islands Tax Free Exchange
    Volunteer Expense
    W2
    Wealth Preservation
    Whipsaw
    Whistleblower
    Yacht Tax Deductions

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
Picture
Chris Moss CPA 
Tax Attorney (DC VA)
210 Wingo Way
Suite 303
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
Tel: 843.768.7100
Fax: 843.768.5400
 copyright @2014 chrismosscpa.  All rights reserved